Animals in the Ancient Near East

The ancient Near East was the site of several key developments in the relationship between the animal world and the human species. These include the first animal domestication after the dog, and the first texts on the relationship, which shed further light on relationships already documented for later periods by archaeozoological remains, artifacts, and figurative representations. It is these diverse sources that make it possible to study this subject, which has been renewed in recent years by archaeological research into human/animal relations.[1]

From the 10th millennium BC onwards, the Ancient Near East underwent a process of Neolithization, characterized by the domestication of plants and animals. The latter profoundly altered the lives of human societies, modifying their activities, resources, and relationship with nature, notably by relegating most of the animal world to the category of the “wild”. The creation of an increasingly complex society, culminating in the emergence of the state and urbanization, led to other changes, notably the development of large-scale animal husbandry distributed among several actors (royal palaces, temples, nomads). From a utilitarian point of view, humans mobilized animals to provide various services in crucial activities (agriculture, transport, warfare). They used animal products for different purposes (food, wool leather clothing, etc.).

The relationship between humans and animals also has a constant symbolic aspect. Many animals were considered vehicles of supernatural forces, and divine symbols, and could be mobilized in various major rituals (sacrifices to the gods, divination, exorcism). The many artistic representations of animals generally refer to this symbolic aspect. The literati also attempted to classify the animals they knew. They developed stereotypes about the characteristics of many of them, which can be found in various literary texts, notably those in which men are compared to animals to highlight a trait of their personality. While some animals had a high symbolic status (lion, bull, horse, snake), others were denigrated and sometimes infamous (pig).

  1. ^ Bodson, L. (2001). "Les animaux dans l'Antiquité : un gisement fécond pour l'histoire des connaissances naturalistes et des contextes culturels" [Animals in Antiquity: a fertile source for the history of naturalist knowledge and cultural contexts]. In Cannuyer, C. (ed.). L'animal dans les civilisations orientales. Henri Limet in honorem [The animal in oriental civilizations. Henri Limet in honorem]. Louvain: Soc. Belge d'Études Oriental. pp. 1–27, 29–43.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · View on Wikipedia

Developed by Nelliwinne