Back الخلافة على الكرسي البابوي Arabic خلافه رسوليه ARZ Apostolikong kasanglian BCL Successió apostòlica Catalan Apoštolská posloupnost Czech Olyniaeth apostolaidd Welsh Apostolisk succession Danish Apostolische Sukzession German Αποστολική διαδοχή Greek Apostola posteuleco Esperanto

Apostolic succession

The Episcopal consecration of Deodatus; Claude Bassot [fr] (1580–1630)

Apostolic succession is the method whereby the ministry of the Christian Church is considered by some Christian denominations to be derived from the apostles by a continuous succession, which has usually been associated with a claim that the succession is through a series of bishops.[1] Those of the Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Oriental Orthodox, Church of the East, Scandinavian Lutheran, Anglican, Moravian, Hussite, and Old Catholic traditions maintain that a bishop's orders are neither regular nor valid without consecration through apostolic succession.[2][3][4][5][6] These traditions do not always consider the episcopal consecrations of all of the other traditions as valid.[7]

This series was seen originally as that of the bishops of a particular see founded by one or more of the apostles. According to historian Justo L. González, apostolic succession is generally understood today as meaning a series of bishops, regardless of see, each consecrated by other bishops, themselves consecrated similarly in a succession going back to the apostles.[8] According to the Joint International Commission for Theological Dialogue Between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church, "apostolic succession" means more than a mere transmission of powers. It is succession in a church which witnesses to the apostolic faith, in communion with the other churches, witnesses of the same apostolic faith. The "see (cathedra) plays an important role in inserting the bishop into the heart of ecclesial apostolicity", but once ordained, the bishop becomes in his church the guarantor of apostolicity and becomes a successor of the apostles.[9][10]

Those who hold for the importance of apostolic succession via episcopal laying on of hands appeal to the New Testament which, they say, implies a personal apostolic succession, from Paul to Timothy and Titus, for example. They appeal as well to other documents of the early Church, especially the Epistle of Clement.[11] In this context, Clement explicitly states that the apostles appointed bishops as successors and directed that these bishops should in turn appoint their own successors; given this, such leaders of the Church were not to be removed without cause and not in this way. Further, proponents of the necessity of the personal apostolic succession of bishops within the Church point to the universal practice of the undivided early Church, up to AD 431, before it was divided into the Church of the East, Oriental Orthodoxy, the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church.

Some Christians, including certain nonconformist Protestants, deny the need for this type of continuity[12][13][14] and severely question the historical claims involved; Anglican academic Eric G. Jay comments that the account given of the emergence of the episcopate in Chapter III of the dogmatic constitution Lumen gentium (1964) "is very sketchy, and many ambiguities in the early history of the Christian ministry are passed over".[15]

  1. ^ Cross, Frank Leslie; Livingstone, Elizabeth A. (2005). The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press. p. 91. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3. Archived from the original on 16 April 2024. Retrieved 1 February 2024.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown (link)
  2. ^ Guidry, Christopher R.; Crossing, Peter F. (1 January 2001). World Christian Trends, AD 30 – AD 2200: Interpreting the Annual Christian Megacensus. William Carey Library. p. 307. ISBN 9780878086085. A number of large episcopal churches (e.g. United Methodist Church, USA) have maintained a succession over 200 years but are not concerned to claim that the succession goes back in unbroken line to the time of the first Apostles. Very many other major episcopal churches, such as the Roman Catholic, Orthodox, Old Catholic, Anglican, and Scandinavian Lutheran, make this claim and contend that a bishop cannot have regular or valid orders unless he has been consecrated in this apostolic succession.
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference Konečný1995 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ Goeckel, Robert F. (3 August 2018). Soviet Religious Policy in Estonia and Latvia: Playing Harmony in the Singing Revolution. Indiana University Press. ISBN 978-0-253-03612-4. Among Lutherans there are also different positions: Scandinavian Lutheran churches claim apostolic succession, but German Lutheran churches (many formed from Prussian-mandated unions with Reformed Churches which reject this belief) do not affirm this element of doctrine. The Latvian and Estonian Lutheran churches had exchanged mutual recognition of this succession with the Anglican Church before WWII. They should be considered among the Scandinavian group rather than the German group, explaining theological motivation for consecration by a sitting bishop (Melton, Encyclopedia, 91).
  5. ^ Podmore, Colin (1998). The Moravian Church in England, 1728-1760. Clarendon Press. p. 121. ISBN 978-0-19-820725-2. The Moravian Church was heir to an ancient, espiscopal Church (the Unitas Fratrum) ... its bishops were believed to stand in the apostolic succession, and theri discipline an simple lifestyle were reminiscent of the primitive Church. All these features were vital in winning approval from Anglican bishops, particularly High Churchmen, and of John Wesley, who did not join the Moravians, but they were mentioned by none of those who did.
  6. ^ Barrett, David B.; Kurian, George Thomas; Johnson, Todd M. (2001). World Christian Encyclopedia: A Comparative Survey of Churches and Religions in the Modern World. Oxford University Press. p. 234. ISBN 978-0-19-507963-0. ...the [Czechoslovak Hussite] church reintroduced the apostolic succession of bishops in 1935 and has tended towards greater orthodoxy in recent years.
  7. ^ Apostolic succession. Encyclopædia Britannica. 4 January 2007.
  8. ^ Cite error: The named reference ETT was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  9. ^ "II,4", The Mystery of the Church and of the Eucharist in the Light of the Mystery of the Holy Trinity, 1982
  10. ^ "Apostolic succession", The Sacrament of Order in the Sacramental Structure of the Church with Particular Reference to the Importance of Apostolic Succession for the Santification and Unity of the People of God, 1988
  11. ^ Adam, Karl. The Spirit of Catholicism. Doubleday, 1957 p. 20
  12. ^ Webb, Jim (11 October 2005). Born Fighting: How the Scots-Irish Shaped America. Crown. p. 115. ISBN 978-0-7679-2295-1.
  13. ^ Cross, F. L.; Livingstone, E. A., eds. (2005). "apostolic succession". The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.
  14. ^ "Apostolic Succession". The Columbia Encyclopedia (sixth ed.). Columbia University Press. 2004. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 24 August 2017.
  15. ^ Jay, Eric G. The Church: its changing image through twenty centuries. John Knox Press: 1980, p.316f
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · View on Wikipedia

Developed by Nelliwinne