Apple's EU tax dispute


European investigation into Apple's tax deal with Ireland
Type of projectState aid investigation under EU rules
OwnerEuropean Commission
Key peopleMargrethe Vestager, Tim Cook, Helena Malikova, Michael Noonan
Established29 August 2016 (2016-08-29)
Disestablished10 September 2024 (2024-09-10)
StatusEuropean Court of Justice confirmed European Commission's ruling
Commission Decision (EU) 2017/1283
Decided 30 August 2016
CaseC/2016/5605
CelexID32017D1283
Language of proceedingsEnglish
Ireland and Others v European Commission
Decided 15 July 2020
CaseT‑778/16, T‑892/16
ECLIECLI:EU:T:2020:338
ChamberSeventh
Language of proceedingsEnglish
Court composition
Judge-Rapporteur
Vesna Tomljenović
President
Marc van der Woude
Judges
Keywords
State aid — Aid implemented by Ireland — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and unlawful and ordering recovery of the aid — Advance tax decisions (tax rulings) — Selective tax advantages — Arm's length principle
European Commission v Ireland and Apple Sales International
Decided 10 September 2024
CaseC-465/20 P
ECLIECLI:EU:C:2024:724
ChamberGrand
Language of proceedingsEnglish
Court composition
Judge-Rapporteur
Nils Wahl
President
Koen Lenaerts
Judges
Advocate General
Giovanni Pitruzzella
Keywords
Appeal – State aid – Article 107(1) TFEU – Tax rulings issued by a Member State – Selective tax advantages – Allocation of profits generated by intellectual property licences to branches of non-resident companies – Arm’s length principle

Apple's EU tax dispute refers to an investigation by the European Commission into tax arrangements between Apple and Ireland, which allowed the company to pay close to zero corporate tax over 10 years.[1]

On 29 August 2016, after a two-year investigation, European Commission ordered Apple to pay €13 billion, plus interest, in unpaid Irish taxes from 2004–14 to the Irish state.[2] It was the largest corporate tax fine (in fact a recovery order, technically not a fine) in history.[3] The European bureaucrat, Helena Malikova, was credited with uncovering the extent of the tax avoidance by Apple, namely that the company was paying only 0.005 per cent tax on profits booked through its Irish subsidiary.[4] In November 2016, the Irish government formally appealed the ruling, claiming there was no violation of Irish tax law,[5][6] and that the commission's action was "an intrusion into Irish sovereignty", as national tax policy is excluded from EU treaties.[7] In November 2016, Apple CEO Tim Cook announced Apple would appeal,[8] and in September 2018, Apple lodged €13 billion to an escrow account, pending appeal.[9] In July 2020, the European General Court struck down EU tax decision as illegal, ruling in favor of Apple.

The issue was Apple's variation of the Double Irish tax system, which, from 2004 to 2014, Apple used to shield €110.8 billion[10][11] of non–US profits from tax.[12]

On 9 January 2015, Apple informed the Commission[a] that it closed its hybrid–Double Irish, base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) tool.[13] In Q1 2015, Apple restructured into a new Irish BEPS tool called the Capital Allowances for Intangible Assets (CAIA) tool,[11][14] also called the Green Jersey. Apple's Q1 2015 restructuring required a 12 July 2016 restatement of Irish 2015 GDP, which increased it by 26.3 per cent (later revised to 34.4 per cent); the restatement was called "leprechaun economics", and led to new EU inquiries in 2017,[15][16] and accusations in June 2018, that Ireland was the world's largest tax haven.[17]

Ireland's rejection of the EU Commission's "windfall" in back-taxes surprised some.[18]

On 15 July 2020, the European General Court ruled that the Commission "did not succeed in showing to the requisite legal standard" that Apple had received tax advantages from Ireland, and ruled in favour of Apple.[19]

The European Commission appealed the decision of the lower court before the European Court of Justice, the supreme court in matters of EU law.

On 10 September 2024 the European Court of Justice set aside the judgment of the lower General Court, which previously overturned the Commission’s decision, by reasoning that it contained legal errors. The 2016 decision by the European Commission was fully reinstated in this final judgement. As a consequence Apple is ordered to pay €13 billion, in unpaid Irish taxes.[20][21]

  1. ^ Houlder, Vanessa; Barker, Alex; Beesley, Arthur (30 August 2016). "Apple's EU tax dispute explained". Retrieved 22 February 2023.
  2. ^ a b "COMMISSION DECISION of 30.8.2016 on STATE AID SA. 38373 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2014/CP) implemented by Ireland to Apple" (PDF). EU Commission. 30 August 2016. Brussels. 30.8.2016 C(2016) 5605 final. Total Pages (130)
  3. ^ Foroohar, Rana (30 August 2016). "Apple vs. the E.U. Is the Biggest Tax Battle in History". Time. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
  4. ^ Khan, Mehreen (13 September 2024). "Interview extracts between Apple tax advisers and Irish Revenue". The Times. Retrieved 20 December 2024.
  5. ^ Brennan, Joe (30 August 2016). "How EU forced Ireland and Apple into a €13bn tax defeat". Irish Times. The Revenue Commissioners has insisted it always collected the full amount of tax due from Apple in accordance with Irish law.
  6. ^ "30 August 2016: Revenue statement on EU commission decision on State aid investigation". Revenue Commissioners. 30 August 2016.
  7. ^ Halpin, Padraic; Humphries, Conor (2 September 2016). "Ireland to join Apple in fight against EU tax ruling". Reuters. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
  8. ^ Cook, Tim (30 August 2016). "Customer Letter". Apple (Ireland). Apple Inc. Retrieved 14 November 2016.
  9. ^ Cite error: The named reference 13bn was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  10. ^ Cite error: The named reference cof1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  11. ^ a b Seamus Coffey, Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (24 January 2018). "What Apple did next". Economic Incentives, University College Cork.
  12. ^ Barrera, Rita; Bustamante, Jessica (2 August 2017). "The Rotten Apple: Tax Avoidance in Ireland". The International Trade Journal. 32: 150–161. doi:10.1080/08853908.2017.1356250. S2CID 158385468.
  13. ^ "CASE SA.38373: STATE AID TO APPLE". EU Commission. 30 November 2016.
  14. ^ "Tax Avoidance and the Irish Balance of Payments". Council on Foreign Relations. 25 April 2018.
  15. ^ Cite error: The named reference eu was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  16. ^ Cite error: The named reference sb1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  17. ^ "Ireland is the world's biggest corporate 'tax haven', say academics". Irish Times. 13 June 2018. New Gabriel Zucman study claims State shelters more multinational profits than the entire Caribbean
  18. ^ "Irish appeal of Apple ruling a 'strange decision', says Moscovici". Irish Times. 9 September 2016.
  19. ^ Cite error: The named reference IT11 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  20. ^ Cite error: The named reference ECJ final ruling was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  21. ^ Cite error: The named reference ECJ final ruling2 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).


Cite error: There are <ref group=lower-alpha> tags or {{efn}} templates on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=lower-alpha}} template or {{notelist}} template (see the help page).


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia · View on Wikipedia

Developed by Nelliwinne