Craig v. Boren | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued October 5, 1976 Decided December 20, 1976 | |
Full case name | Craig et al. v. Boren, Governor of Oklahoma, et al. |
Citations | 429 U.S. 190 (more) 97 S. Ct. 451; 50 L. Ed. 2d 397; 1976 U.S. LEXIS 183 |
Case history | |
Prior | Dismissed, Walker v. Hall, 399 F. Supp. 1304 (W.D. Okla. 1975), probable jurisdiction noted sub. nom., Craig v. Boren, 423 U.S. 1047 (1976). |
Subsequent | Rehearing denied, 429 U.S. 1124 (1977). |
Holding | |
To regulate in a sex-discriminatory fashion, the government must demonstrate that its use of sex-based criteria is substantially related to the achievement of important governmental objectives. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Brennan, joined by White, Marshall, Powell, Stevens; Blackmun (all but Part III–D) |
Concurrence | Powell |
Concurrence | Stevens |
Concurrence | Blackmun (in part) |
Concurrence | Stewart (in judgment) |
Dissent | Burger |
Dissent | Rehnquist |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |
This case overturned a previous ruling or rulings | |
Goesaert v. Cleary (1948) |
Craig v. Boren, 429 U.S. 190 (1976), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that statutory or administrative sex classifications were subject to intermediate scrutiny under the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause.[1] The case was argued by future Supreme Court justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg while she was working for the American Civil Liberties Union.[2]