Cromwellian conquest of Ireland

Cromwellian conquest of Ireland
Part of Irish Confederate Wars and Wars of the Three Kingdoms
Oliver Cromwell
Date 15 August 1649 – 27 September 1653 Location Ireland Result Commonwealth of England victory
Belligerents
Commonwealth of England	Confederate Ireland Royalists
Commanders and leaders
Oliver Cromwell Michael Jones Henry Ireton Edmund Ludlow Charles Fleetwood Charles Coote	James Butler Ulick Burke Owen Roe O'Neill Heber MacMahon
Strength
~12,000 New Model Army ~10,000 locally raised	c. 20,000 to 30,000
Casualties and losses
c. 15,000 dead or wounded	c. 15,000 to 20,000 dead or wounded

The Cromwellian conquest of Ireland (1649–1653) was the re-conquest of Ireland by the Commonwealth of England, initially led by Oliver Cromwell. It forms part of the 1641 to 1652 Irish Confederate Wars, and wider 1639 to 1653 Wars of the Three Kingdoms. Modern estimates suggest that during this period, Ireland experienced a demographic loss totalling around 15 to 20% of the pre-1641 population, due to fighting, famine and bubonic plague.

The Irish Rebellion of 1641 brought much of Ireland under the control of the Irish Catholic Confederation, who engaged in a multi-sided war with Royalists, Parliamentarians, Scots Covenanters, and local Presbyterian militia. Following the execution of Charles I in January 1649, the Confederates allied with their former Royalist opponents against the newly established Commonwealth of England. Cromwell landed near Dublin in August 1649 with an expeditionary force, and by the end of 1650 the Confederacy had been defeated, although sporadic guerrilla warfare continued until 1653.

The Act for the Settlement of Ireland 1652 barred Catholics from most public offices and confiscated large amounts of their land, much of which was given to Protestant settlers. These proved a continuing source of grievance, while the brutality of conquest means Cromwell remains a deeply reviled figure in Ireland.^[1] How far he was personally responsible for the atrocities is still debated; some writers have suggested his actions were within what were then viewed as accepted rules of war, while many academic historians disagree.^[2]