Submission declined on 6 March 2025 by KylieTastic (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 20 February 2025 by Owais Khursheed (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Owais Khursheed 14 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 19 February 2025 by Chaotic Enby (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of web content). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include: Declined by Chaotic Enby 15 days ago.
| |
Comment: The "References" you link do not seem to actually exist. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 14:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)
https://alfaazthewords.in/hukus-bukus-a-unique-kashmiri-cartoon-channel-bringing-education-and-culture-to-children/ Reference has been Cited please publish it now
- This is newly generated page, the Animated series created by 16 year old kid he is having very less knowledge about this. Also it was instructed to upload page. We will gather media later phase
Hukus Bukus is an online portal and digital media project committed to disseminating Kashmiri culture, education, and national harmony through animated storytelling and educational content. Started in January 2024, the platform seeks to appeal to younger audiences by inculcating cultural pride and social harmony.
- in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- reliable
- secondary
- independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.