| Submission declined on 2 March 2025 by Rahmatula786 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. | &sq=Google&lang=en&file=File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg){kind=logo} |
| Submission declined on 25 February 2025 by Bluethricecreamman (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner. Declined by Bluethricecreamman 10 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 28 November 2024 by MarcGarver (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by MarcGarver 3 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 27 November 2024 by Ibjaja055 (talk). This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner. Declined by Ibjaja055 3 months ago. | |
Comment: Please see WP:NOTARESUME. unlikely to meet WP:NSCHOLAR either User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 01:50, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
Iman Sadeghi, Ph.D. (born 1984) is a computer scientist and a computer graphics researcher. He is a Principal Software & Technology Consultant at Quandary Peak Research, a software consultation firm based in Los Angeles.[1] Previously, he held roles at Google, Walt Disney Animation Studios, and Lucasfilm.[2][3]
- ^ "Quandary Peak Research". Quandary Peak Research. Retrieved 2024-11-27.
- ^ "JurisPro Expert Witness Directory". JurisPro. Retrieved 2024-11-27.
- ^ "Seak Expert Witness Directory: Iman Sadeghi, Ph.D." Seak Expert Witness Directory.