Draft:Mahananda Halder

Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,210 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Mahananda Halder (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 38 days ago by HalderRemer88 (talk: D · +) · Last edited 0 seconds ago

Submission declined on 12 November 2024 by SafariScribe (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by SafariScribe 2 months ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Submission declined on 11 November 2024 by Bobby Cohn (talk). The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you. Declined by Bobby Cohn 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 11 November 2024 by Timtrent (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Timtrent 2 months ago.

• Comment: Thank you for making the changes so far. There are more required, without which it will not be accepted. There will be more to do after these, though. This is an iterative process.
  Your current reference 1 is to https://sites.google.com/view/srisriguruchand-charit/home which is not a reliable source. It must go, please.
  I feel on consideration that https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eb2RoLzSVNs&t=798s as the official prime minister's channel passes WP:YOUTUBE. It may remain.
  All inline links should be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links. There should be no links pointing to external sources until those in the 'References' section (with the exception of one optional link in any infobox).
  In general you have not referenced the facts in this piece. That needs to be corrected especially where a fact you state is susceptible to challenge
  Doing this things now will speed the review process. They do not guarantee acceptance, but not doing them guarantees the reverse 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:52, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Please see WP:MOSBOLD and remove the various random 'boldface font examples throughout . Otherwise it creates work for others.
  Also see WP:HONORIFICS and eliminate 100% of those. Thay also create work for others. They may be polite im your society but Wikipedia does not want them. Not a single 'shri' or other honorific may remain
  Sites.google... and Youtube are not acceptable as sources.
  Wikipedia may never be used as a reference. Please use Wikilinks instead. See WP:CIRCULAR. Those faux references must be replaced.
  Do not keep resubmitting after making a tiny change. This soon becomes disruptive and tendentious 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Same citation concerns. See WP:REFB for assistance in referencing. Bobby Cohn (talk) 20:26, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Broadly unreferenced 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 19:44, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

A major contributor to this article appears to have a close connection with its subject. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. Please discuss further on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Mahananda Halder was a prominent Indian politician, barrister, educationist, poet, and a foundational figure in the Matua movement in West Bengal. He played a crucial role in uplifting the Matua community and providing support to East Bengal refugees in 1947 and 1971. Halder founded the Nadia Zila Matua Mahasangha and served as the President of the Teacher's Coordination Society for the Nadia North Zone. He authored Sri Sri Guruchand Charit, a significant work on the life and teachings of Guruchand Thakur. His initiatives included establishing Harichand Seva Sangha in 1970 and Mira High School in Plassey, Nadia, where he served as headmaster from 1952 to 1957. Halder was also the first Parliamentary Secretary in the West Bengal Assembly under Ajay Mukherjee's Bangla Congress and was closely associated with revolutionary figures, including Subhas Chandra Bose.