| Submission declined on 14 January 2025 by SK2242 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 10 January 2025 by Idoghor Melody (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Idoghor Melody 18 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 10 August 2024 by Bearcat (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bearcat 5 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 4 April 2024 by Paul W (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Paul W 9 months ago. | |
| Submission declined on 13 March 2024 by Jamiebuba (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Jamiebuba 10 months ago. | |
Comment: This draft was resubmitted with no improvement. Please do not do this. Drafts that are repeatedly resubmitted with no improvement will be nominated for deletion. SK2242 (talk) 08:13, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: The notability of a mayor is not established just by verifying his election results, or by showing that media occasionally contacted him for soundbite on an issue. It's passed by writing substantive content about his political impact: specific things he did, specific projects he spearheaded, specific effects his leadership had on the development of the city, and on and so forth.
For example, the article states that "during his mayoralty, the city has experienced significant population growth" -- but it fails to demonstrate that he personally did anything in particular that caused that to happen. And "national media attention for efforts to...", similarly, fails to say what if anything he did about those issues: we would need to see content about specific projects he launched to deal with those issues, not just evidence that the media called him for a pull quote about them.
We're not just looking for newspaper articles that have his name in them, we're looking for newspaper articles in which he and his work are the subject. Bearcat (talk) 16:58, 10 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NPOL, being an elected politician below state/province level ("Just being an elected local official... does not guarantee notability ....)" No significant coverage - mainly routine reporting of local politics, etc. Paul W (talk) 17:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Matthew Shoemaker, B.A., LL.B, LL.M. (born November 14, 1988) is a Canadian politician, who was elected mayor of Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, in the 2022 municipal election.