 | Review waiting, please be patient.
This may take 2 months or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,184 pending submissions waiting for review.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Reviewer tools
|
| Submission declined on 19 October 2024 by KeepItGoingForward (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review. |  |
Comment: Show notability and also clear up the publication to only present key ones. KeepItGoingForward (talk) 00:25, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: The list of publications is far too detailed; Wikipedia biographies should list only the significant publications (in most cases at most 5-6). The draft provides no evidence of academic notability, such as a major society fellowship, heavily-cited publications (for instance, multiple publications with at least three-digit citation counts in Google Scholar), or a named or distinguished professorship. The use of inline external links violates WP:EL. Most of the material in this draft has no reference (not something by Jacquart, but something published by people independent of Jacquart and her employers, about her and her work). This is far from ready to be published as an article and far from convincing that we should have an article about her. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:19, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
Melissa Jacquart is an Assistant Professor in the Philosophy Department at the University of Cincinnati and Associate Director for the Center for Public Engagement with Science. She is also a Faculty Affiliate in the Women, Gender, & Sexuality Studies Department and the Physics Department of the University of Cincinnati. Jacquart's research focuses on epistemology in philosophy of science, with an emphasis on models and computer simulations in astrophysics. Her work also examines the role that philosophy can play in fostering general public understanding of science and in science education. Additionally, she is interested in developing effective teaching methodologies for philosophy.
Dr. Jacquart has received the Whiting Programs Fellowship for her project "Bringing Philosophy to Science Fairs—an after-school Philosophy & Science Fair Club for 7th and 8th grade students in Cincinnati" in 2022[1] and the David W. Concepción Prize for Excellence in Philosophy Teaching in 2025.[2]