Submission declined on 8 February 2025 by Ktkvtsh (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here. |  |
| Submission declined on 5 February 2025 by Greenman (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Greenman 9 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 22 January 2025 by AstrooKai (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by AstrooKai 23 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 31 December 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 45 days ago.
| |
Comment: Sources should also verify statements. For example, the fifth source goes to the front page of a website making no mention of the subject. Greenman (talk) 21:59, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Please correct the referencing, starting with removing all those nowiki wrappers which are preventing the cite templates from operating. See WP:REFB for advice. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:11, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: No evidence of notability per WP:NCORP, and reads like a company presentation. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:10, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
WorkWave is an American software company specializing in cloud computing solutions for field service management and last-mile delivery management. The company is headquartered in Holmdel, New Jersey.
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.