According to certain genocide experts, including Raphael Lemkin – the individual who coined the term genocide – colonization is intrinsically genocidal.[7][8][9] Lemkin saw genocide via colonialism as a two-stage process: (1) the destruction of the indigenous group's way of life, followed by (2) the settlers' imposition of their way of life on the indigenous group.[10][11] Other scholars view genocide as associated with but distinct from settler colonialism.[4][12] The expansion of various Western European colonial powers such as the British and Spanish empires and the subsequent establishment of colonies on indigenous territories frequently involved acts of genocidal violence against indigenous groups in Europe, the Americas, Africa, Asia, and Oceania.[13]
The designation of specific events as genocidal is frequently controversial.[14][15]Raphael Lemkin, who invented the concept of genocide, originally intended a broad definition that encompassed colonial violence, but in order to pass the 1948 Genocide Convention, he narrowed his definition to physical and biological destruction (as opposed to cultural genocide) and added the requirement of genocidal intent.[5] Although some scholars use the Genocide Convention definition,[15] others have "criticized [it] as a highly flawed law for its overemphasis on intent, the imprecision of a key phrase 'destruction in whole or in part,' and the narrow exclusivity of the groups protected"—factors which reduce its applicability to anti-indigenous violence.[5]
^Moses 2008a, pp. 8–9: "Extra-European colonial cases also featured prominently in this projected global history of genocide. In 'Part III: Modern Times,' he wrote the following numbered chapters: (1) Genocide by the Germans against the Native Africans; (3) Belgian Congo; (11) Hereros; (13) Hottentots; (16) Genocide against the American Indians; (25) Latin America; (26) Genocide against the Aztecs; (27) Yucatan; (28) Genocide against the Incas; (29) Genocide against the Maoris of New Zealand; (38) Tasmanians; (40) S.W. Africa; and finally, (41) Natives of Australia ... While Lemkin's linking of genocide and colonialism may surprise those who think that his neologism was modeled after the Holocaust of European Jewry, an investigation of his intellectual development reveals that the concept is the culmination of a long tradition of European legal and political critique of colonization and empire."
^Adhikari, Mohamed (2021). "'No Savage Shall Inherit the Land': Civilian-driven Violence in the Making of Settler Genocides". In Adhikari, Mohamed (ed.). Civilian-Driven Violence and the Genocide of Indigenous Peoples in Settler Societies. Routledge. ISBN978-1-003-01555-0.
^ abNovic, Elisa (20 October 2016). "The Concept of Cultural Genocide: A Historical–Legal Perspective". The Concept of Cultural Genocide: An International Law Perspective. Oxford University Press. p. 8. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198787167.003.0002. ISBN978-0-19-878716-7. Retrieved 17 January 2024. Doctrinal opinions can be split into two categories: those who advocate for a broader understanding of the crime, as Larry May does, and those who consider, on the basis of the 1948 Genocide Convention, that genocide should be thought of exclusively in physical and biological terms while cultural genocide should rather be addressed as a human rights issue, per William A. Schabas.
Cite error: There are <ref group=note> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=note}} template (see the help page).