 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (January 2024) |
| A joint Politics and Economics series |
| Social choice and electoral systems |
|---|
 |
 Mathematics portal |
Graduated majority judgment (GMJ), sometimes called the usual judgment[1] or continuous Bucklin voting,[2] is a single-winner rated voting rule that selects the candidate with the highest median score.[1] It was first suggested as an improvement on majority judgment by Andrew Jennings in 2010.[3]
GMJ begins by counting all ballots for their first choice. If no candidate has a majority then later (second, third, etc.) preferences are gradually added in, continuing until one candidate reaches 50% approval. The first candidate to reach a majority of the vote is the winner.
- ^ a b Fabre, Adrien (2021). "Tie‐breaking the highest median: alternatives to the majority judgment". Social Choice and Welfare. 56: 101–124. doi:10.1007/s00355-020-01269-9. S2CID 226196615 – via Springer Link.
- ^ Smith, Warren D. "On Balinski & Laraki's "majority judgment" median-based range-like voting scheme". RangeVoting.org. Center for Range Voting. Retrieved 2024-01-02.
- ^ Jennings, Andrew (2010). Monotonicity and Manipulability of Ordinal and Cardinal Social Choice Functions (PDF). Arizona State University. pp. 25–30.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)