New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued April 19, 1983 Decided June 13, 1983 | |
Full case name | New Mexico, et al. v. Mescalero Apache Tribe |
Citations | 462 U.S. 324 (more) 103 S. Ct. 2378; 76 L. Ed. 2d 611; 1983 U.S. LEXIS 57 |
Case history | |
Prior | Mescalero Apache Tribe v. State of New Mexico, 630 F.2d 724 (10th Cir. 1980) |
Holding | |
The application of New Mexico's laws to on-reservation hunting and fishing by nonmembers of the Tribe is preempted by the operation of federal law. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Marshall, joined by unanimous |
New Mexico v. Mescalero Apache Tribe, 462 U.S. 324 (1983), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the application of New Mexico's laws to on-reservation hunting and fishing by nonmembers of the Tribe is preempted by the operation of federal law.[1]