 | This is an archive of past discussions about George W. Bush. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
I think the links are somewhat POV. There are way more links that call Bush a Chimp, etc. than there are simple informational or Republican-biased links. I myself have a Republican/Moderate (See my User page) POV, but I certainly don't force them on everybody else by adding links to Bill Clinton's page. I think we should start a cleanup of this article (or at least the links section). Ilyanep 23:54, 27 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- We aren't resonsible for external links and don't need to guarantee that they're NPOV. If they're oppositional, we can label them as such. Of course, we don't want too many links...--Jiang 04:16, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- Agree with Jiang. This article has plenty of content; having a large number of links is OK. If you want to add more pro-Bush links, feel free; taking some out would not be productive, in my opinion. Meelar 05:24, 28 Jan 2004 (UTC)
64.158.115.54 (Talk) (Removed "and the Skull and Bones Society" from the section "== Personal Live and Education ==" since that society is only a rumor and not commonly substantiated by evidence. Grammar changes too.) Not a rumor. Why is this connection suppressed? Something awkward? Wetman 01:42, 3 Feb 2004 (UTC)
The Skull and Bones Society is not a rumor. They own property, you can visit them if you want. Lirath Q. Pynnor
Removed (not an unusual occurrance); if it's not unusual, that doesn't be reiterated. (If it is unusual, as I suspect, it's not factual.) - Hephæstos|§ 22:10, 12 Feb 2004 (UTC)