Talk:Golem Arcana

Golem Arcana has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 9, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Golem Arcana appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 November 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that Golem Arcana is a miniature wargaming game that interfaces with a digital app through the use of a Bluetooth stylus? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Golem Arcana.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Board and table games Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Video games Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks: Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks view watch edit history shell vg talk alerts purge AfDs JakeFuture27 (4 participants) Gianmarco Tocco (1 participant) Yuri Sakazaki (1 participant) B1t (1 participant) Satandisk (3 participants) Rebecca Chambers (4 participants) Gameplay of Overwatch (12 participants) Taito SJ System (3 participants) Hannah Telle (4 participants) MaxPlay Classic Games Volume 1 (4 participants; relisted) Aimsey (4 participants; relisted) Merge discussions Evil Empire (company) (discussion) Console game (discussion) Pokémon Essentials (discussion) Input lag (discussion) Minecraft – Volume Beta (discussion) Other discussions No major discussions Featured content candidates List of generation II Pokémon (nom) Kim Kitsuragi (nom) Lego Indiana Jones: The Original Adventures (nom) Ethan Winters (nom) Fallout: New Vegas (nom) The Legend of Dragoon (nom) Rockstar North (nom) Good article nominations Deathloop (start) Blast Wind (nom) Project Zero 2: Wii Edition (start) Pokémon Stadium (nom) Bit Pilot (start) Tom Clancy's The Division 2 (start) Berzerk (video game) (start) Frostpunk (nom) Cry of Fear (nom) The King of Fighters '97 (nom) F1 24 (start) Façade (video game) (start) Prey (2017 video game) (start) Transfer Pak (start) Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (start) Lost Sphear (start) Pocket Monsters Stadium (start) Oatchi (start) Necromorph (start) Aperture Hand Lab (start) DYK nominations Sun Haven Reviews and reassessments The Legend of Dragoon (rev) Appy Awards Anarchy Online (nom) Deus Ex (video game) (nom) List of major Super Smash Bros. Ultimate tournaments Dynasty Warriors 4 (nom) Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga (nom) The Operative: No One Lives Forever (nom) Articles that need... assessment (0) (0) reassessment (0) cleanup (4) infoboxes (8) cover art (264) screenshots (9,070) photos (70) translation from japan (186) creation merging

This review is transcluded from Talk:Golem Arcana/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 13:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be happy to review this JAGUAR  13:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• "with some seeing it as a boon and others as a detriment" - a 'boon'?
• "and as rewards for optional missions encountered through the app" - for completing optional missions might sound clearer
• " Another type of card, relics, allow players" - maybe Another type of card, known as relics
• "The golems, cards, and game board are covered in tiny magnetic dots" - 'tiny' sounds unencyclopaedic. How about small?
• "Backers could get the base game with a pledge of $55" - why pledge? Does this mean if they donated 55 dollars they would receive the game?
• "Yahoo Tech called it "hefty"" - stylised as 'Yahoo! Tech' (without the italics)
• No dead links

It's a nice article and I like the idea of this innovation! Once all of the above are clarified this this should pass. JAGUAR  15:10, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jaguar: Thank you for the review. I've made all of the suggested changes except for changing the word boon. I'm not sure if you're asking what it is (in which case, it's "something to be thankful for; blessing; benefit"), or if you're asking for me to change it. If it's the latter, please pick a word you like better and either swap it out yourself or let me know, and I'd be happy to do so. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:21, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for addressing them quickly! 'Boon' isn't something I come across a lot, but anyway this article meets the GA criteria. Well done JAGUAR  12:47, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 15:02, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]