 | This is an archive of past discussions about Time Cube. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
- Result of RfAr: In the month of July, 2005, a request for arbitration was left open concerning this article. Both sides were allowed to express their viewpoints. Afterwards, the arbitrators made the following comments. Please leave this section here for reference; any changes will be removed.
- Accept Fred Bauder July 7, 2005 22:39 (UTC)
- Accept ➥the Epopt 23:08, 9 July 2005 (UTC)
- Accept Theresa Knott (a tenth stroke) 17:32, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm not sure you need the ArbCom to tell you what to do with an incoherent POV-pushing anon ... - David Gerard 10:05, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
- Reject. As David, this is not a situation where you need arbitration. Just block as needed -- sannse (talk) 16:39, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- Reject - Concur with David, shoot on sight, no arbcom needed. →Raul654 17:26, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
- Reject, agree with David. James F. (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2005 (UTC)
- Reject. Feel free to block on sight. You don't need our permission. Neutralitytalk 18:43, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
For those who haven't been following the discussion... A mostly anon user, referred to as TimeCubeGuy, frequently reverts pages to some variant of this version [1]. The "unofficial" result of the above ArbCom (the case was rejected on grounds that the user was a simple troll/crank) was to shoot this user's edits on sight: that is, if you see the page resembling the page referenced above, it is considered vandalism and should be reverted.
