Back قالب:Self-published source Arabic टेम्पलेट:Self-published source Bihari টেমপ্লেট:Self-published source Bengali/Bangla Πρότυπο:Αυτοδημοσιευμένη πηγή Greek الگو:منبع خودمنتشرشده Persian Modelo:Fonte autopublicada Galician Templat:Self-published source ID 틀:개인이 출판한 출처 Korean ഫലകം:Self-published source Malayalam Templat:Sumber terbitan sendiri Malay
 | This template is used on approximately 6,400 pages and changes may be widely noticed. Test changes in the template's /sandbox or /testcases subpages, or in your own user subpage. Consider discussing changes on the talk page before implementing them.
Preview message: Transclusion count updated automatically (see documentation). |
Usage
[edit]{{Self-published source|date=January 2025}}
This is an inline citation annotation template used inside <ref>...</ref> to flag a source as self-published and thus potentially unreliable, per WP:Verifiability#Self-published sources (WP:Identifying reliable sources#Self-published sources and WP:Neutral point of view are also relevant, but the link produced by the template goes to that section at the Verifiability policy).
To flag blocks of information as questionably sourced in this manner, use Template:Self-published inline, outside of <ref>...</ref>. For whole sections or articles, use Template:Self-published.
This template will categorize tagged articles into Category:Accuracy disputes (but see parameter below).
Why this template exists: Sometimes it is proper to cite a self-published source (e.g. for WP:ABOUTSELF purposes, or to identify a company's own material as the source for a claim that the company made about itself). The reader should still be very aware that the source is self-published.
Parameters
[edit]|date=January 2025– Add the date, so that the article is categorized correctly. A bot may add this latter if you omit it, but the month will be that of the bot adding it, not the date it was originally added, if different.|reason=– a place for editors to explain why this source is believed to be self-published (and/or why it should be permissible as one); displays as a tooltip.|expert=y– Suppresses Category:Accuracy disputes when the author is an expert, and the accuracy is not disputed; rather, a secondary source should be used if one can be found, to improve verifiability and reliability.|ABOUTSELF=y– Suppresses Category:Accuracy disputes when all of the material cited to the self-published source it covered by WP:ABOUTSELF policy (i.e., is permissible to source with primary sources, but ideally would be eventually cited to secondary ones).
See also
[edit]- {{Self-published inline}} – a similar inline template for flagging facts in the article as being reliant on a self-published source or sources (use outside <ref>)
- {{User-generated source}} – a similar inline template for flagging the citation itself as being to a user-generated source (use inside <ref>)
- {{User-generated inline}} – a similar inline template for flagging facts in the article as being reliant on a user-generated source or sources (use outside <ref>)
- {{Self-published}} – an article- or section-level banner for self-published sourcing
- {{User-generated}} – an article- or section-level banner for user-generated sourcing
- {{Primary source inline}} – a similar inline template for flagging inappropriate use of a primary source
- {{Primary sources}} – an article- or section-level banner
- {{Tertiary source inline}} – a similar inline template for flagging inappropriate use of a tertiary source
- {{Tertiary}} – for noting a citation to a tertiary source that does not sufficiently or at all cite its own sources (use inside <ref>)
- {{Third-party}} or {{third-party inline}}, when an independent or third-party source is needed
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup