Part of the behavioral sciences |
Economics |
---|
Part of the politics series on |
Neoliberalism |
---|
Trickle-down economics is a pejorative term for government economic policies deemed by opponents to disproportionately favor the upper tier of the economic spectrum (wealthy individuals and large corporations). These opponents reject the notion that spending by this elite group would "trickle down" to those who are less fortunate and lead to economic growth that will eventually benefit the economy as a whole.[1] Use of the term has been criticized on the grounds that no mainstream economist or major political party advocates the trickle-down theory.[2]
Nonetheless, the term has been used broadly by critics of supply-side economics to refer to taxing and spending policies by governments that, intentionally or not, result in widening income inequality; it has also been used in critical references to neoliberalism.[3] Similar criticisms have existed since at least the 19th century, although the term "trickle-down economics" was popularized in the US in reference to supply-side economics and the economic policies of Ronald Reagan.[4]
Major examples of what critics have called "trickle-down economics" in the US include the Reagan tax cuts,[5] the Bush tax cuts,[6] and the Trump tax cuts.[7] Major UK examples include Margaret Thatcher's economic policies in the 1980s and Liz Truss's mini-budget tax cuts of 2022,[8] which was an attempt to revive such Thatcherite policies.[9] While economists who favor supply-side economics generally avoid applying the "trickle down" analogy to it and dispute the focus on tax cuts to the rich, the phrase "trickle down" has also been occasionally used by proponents of such policies.[1][10]
The Bush-era tax cuts were designed to reduce taxes for the wealthy, and the benefits of faster growth were then supposed to trickle down to the middle class.
Behind [Republican tax legislation of 2017] is a theory long popular among conservatives: Slash taxes for corporations and rich people, who will then hire, invest and profit — and cause money to trickle into the pockets of ordinary Americans.
lis truss favours
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).