This article needs editing to comply with Wikipedia's Manual of Style. (December 2015) |
California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians | |
---|---|
Argued December 9, 1986 Decided February 25, 1987 | |
Full case name | California, et al. v. Cabazon band of Mission Indians, et al. |
Citations | 480 U.S. 202 (more) 107 S. Ct. 1083; 94 L. Ed. 2d 244; 55 U.S.L.W. 4225 |
Case history | |
Prior | 783 F.2d 900 (9th Cir. 1986) (affirmed and remanded) |
Holding | |
Indian reservations may not engage in a form of gaming when that form is illegal in the state; conversely, Indian reservations may engage in a form of gaming when that form is legal in the state. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | White, joined by Rehnquist, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell |
Dissent | Stevens, joined by O'Connor, Scalia |
Laws applied | |
18 U.S.C. § 1151; 28 U.S.C.S. § 1162 | |
Superseded by | |
Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (1988) |
California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, 480 U.S. 202 (1987), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the development of Native American gaming. The Supreme Court's decision effectively overturned the existing laws restricting gaming/gambling on U.S. Indian reservations.