Draft:Kelley Ross

Submission declined on 25 January 2025 by Kovcszaln6 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by Kovcszaln6 53 days ago. Last edited 0 seconds ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Once you save your changes using the "Publish changes" button below, you will be able to resubmit your draft for review by pressing the "Resubmit" button that will appear here.

• Comment: Friesian.com is not independent if Ross is the proprietor of it. Quillette is not reliable. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 10:09, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Kelley Ross (born October 4, 1949) is an American philosopher in the Friesian tradition and proprietor of the philosophy website Friesian.com.^[1]. As such he advocates an epistemological tradition that began in the post-Kantian era with philosopher Jakob Fries (1773-1843) and enjoyed a revival in the early 20th century under Leonard Nelson (1882-1927). While Nelson's acolytes went on to abandon uniquely Friesian principles, notably the theory of non-intuitive immediate knowledge^[2], Ross has hewn closer to the fountainheads of the tradition. Ross casts the Friesian theory as one of the few in the history of philosophy that can be compared to Platonic recollection^[3]. He has even gone so far as to explain "Why I Am a Platonist"^[4] and to make good on Plato's own unfulfilled promise to deliver "A Lecture on the Good" which he presented to the round table, "Perspectives on Ethical Sentiments," at Oxford University's Hertford College on March 25, 2010^[5]