- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with no prejudice against renomination. Many arguments to keep are weak, as they discuss the concept of inorganic reactions and not a list thereof. Conversely, the argument that this could have infinite scope is well rebutted by the argument that it could be pruned to a list of notable reactions, or of types of reactions. There is consensus that the article is currently in poor shape, but not enough support for blowing it up and starting over that I could justify closing as "delete". I suggest interested editors try to fix the scope, and if that becomes impossible the TNT argument will be more persuasive in the future. Vanamonde93 (talk) 17:12, 10 January 2025 (UTC)