The following discussions are requested to have community-wide attention:
| Hello! I'm requesting for your consensus on whether infoboxes for songs and albums should be customized with background colors that reflect the primary colors of the associated album or single cover. I proposed this because to enhance visual appeal and strengthen the connection between the article design and the featured music branding.
Should we allow the customization of infobox background colors to reflect the color of the album or single cover? Choices:
|
Talk:Dragon Age: The Veilguard
| Should the "Lead" and "Reception" sections be restored to the version that was established at the dispute resolution noticeboard (DRN)? (I'll copy over the exact prose after opening the RfC per WP:RFCOPEN #3 to avoid statement truncation). Sariel Xilo (talk) 03:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard
Which of the following best describes the reliability of Jacobin (magazine)?
|
| The book's genre is listed as "Gothic horror". However, no citation is given and this isn't discussed in the article. Where is this information sourced from? LupinOnTheFritz (talk) 06:11, 11 January 2025 (UTC) |
| Should this article's Filmography section include the web series Battle for Dream Island? Ithinkiplaygames (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2025 (UTC) |
Talk:Australia's Funniest Home Videos
| I would like to start a request for comment on the usage of a "closing songs" table in this article.
I originally removed the table on 30 December for several reasons, which I will go into detail about below. It was then reinstated on 1 January by who I believe is a sockpuppet of a long-term vandal on Wikipedia (I go into more detail about this vandal below). I then removed it again, mostly because of the Wikipedia guideline that states that edits from banned and blocked users can be reverted for any reason, but also because the IP user failed to give a reason why it should be kept. It was then reinstated today on 2 January by user NickHrvo (talk · contribs). In order to not prolong an edit war and to prevent any violations of our three revert rule, I have decided to start this RfC. There are a few reasons as to why I believe this table should be removed:
I will notify a few WikiProjects, along with NickHrvo, about this discussion so that they can participate if they so wish, and especially so NickHrvo can provide why he believes the table should be kept. wizzito | say hello! 05:42, 2 January 2025 (UTC) |
| It's been three years since the last discussion was held in regards to the infobox image. As I believed so back then, the current image (which was reached by consensus albeit) is unflattering and as one user noted above, it's a bit creepy. I created a cropped close up so you can see what I'm talking about. Her eyes are half-open, quality isn't the best and if this is truly the 'best' picture that captures what she's known for (as stated in the last discussion three years ago in terms of her outfits), then perhaps it's best to asses an infobox image based on quality over what she's 'known' for. If this is the best picture that shows her during her 'comeback' (as stated in last discussion), then once again, I must emphasize the quality of the picture (awkward lighting, unflattering eye pose, not the best in quality). These are the current images at commons that are best suited for an infobox image. As noted in other talk page discussions, when the subject of an article passes away, their infobox image is also replaced with a black and white picture or of one that captures them in their 'prime' so to speak. Although (as of now) Marcos is still alive, I feel that Option B is in better quality than the current picture, shows her as her time as First Lady (much like other first lady articles) and will depict her in her prime when she passes away (not a huge factor now, but worth thinking about). Pinging previous contributors to the discussion three years ago for good measure: @Chieharumachi:, @Crisantom:, @Object404:, @Unilimited247:, @Lochglasgowstrathyre: TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2024 (UTC) |
.jpg){kind=link}